Comparison
Vampauth vs Luraph
Fact-checkedagainst live competitor pricing, September 2026 · Vampauth Team
Luraph has sold Lua obfuscation since 2017, and its engine powers obfuscation for other key systems. But an obfuscator only protects code; it doesn't issue keys, bind hardware, run checkpoints or host your script. Vampauth bundles its own VM-based obfuscation (lite / advanced / maximum presets) into a complete licensing platform — and the whole thing is free.
Bring your own obfuscator
Use Luraph, MoonSec, yours — custom mode hosts any obfuscated script. Ours is included too.
Keyless (FFA) mode
Gate nothing when you want: projects can run key-free with zero friction for your users.
0% revenue cut — always
Checkpoint links point to YOUR accounts. Vampauth never takes a share. No subscription either.
The short version
These are different tools that overlap on one axis. Luraph is a standalone commercial obfuscator: you buy a plan, run your code through it, then still need a key system, hosting and monetization around the output. Vampauth is that entire surrounding pipeline — server-side storage, in-dashboard VM obfuscation, loadstring delivery, HWID-bound keys, checkpoint monetization through your own ad links — with obfuscation included at no charge. If you already trust Luraph for protection, its output still hosts on Vampauth in custom mode; the two aren't mutually exclusive.
Side by side
Luraph positioning (est. 2017, standalone Lua obfuscator) from lura.ph, as of September 2026 — their pricing page is client-rendered, so no pricing figures are quoted here. Vampauth limits from its public plans.
| Feature | Vampauth | Luraph |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Full key system + licensing platformDifferent scopes: Vampauth covers obfuscation plus everything around it. | Standalone Lua obfuscator |
| Obfuscation | Built-in VM engine — lite / advanced / maximum (nested double-VM) presetsWe don't rate protection strength against theirs — use whichever fits; Luraph output still hosts here in custom mode. | Commercial virtualization engine (their specialty since 2017) |
| Price | Free — obfuscation included, no tiersLuraph's pricing is published on their site; Vampauth's obfuscation is not metered on any plan. | Subscription plans (see lura.ph for current pricing) |
| Key system | Yes10,000 HWID-bound licenses per project, free. | No |
| HWID binding | Up to 10 devices per key, configurable | No |
| Checkpoint monetization | Linkvertise / Lootlabs / work.ink — your links, your 100% | No |
| Script hosting + loadstring delivery | Server-side storage, in-game-restricted loadstring URLYou download the obfuscated output from an obfuscator and host it yourself. | No |
| Key-check API | HMAC-signed requests, signed responses | No |
| Discord bot + webhooks | Yes | No |
| Dashboard & analytics | YesBoth give you a web dashboard for your core task. | Yes |
Protection vs licensing: different jobs
Luraph does one job and does it with a decade of reputation: it transforms Lua source into something hard to read or tamper with. That matters — it's why other platforms lean on Luraph as their obfuscation backend. But once your script is obfuscated, Luraph's job is done: distribution, licensing, key management, monetization and revocation are all still your problem.
Vampauth starts where the obfuscator stops. The same dashboard that obfuscates your script also issues HWID-bound keys, verifies checkpoint completions server-side, serves the build through a game-restricted loadstring, and lets you revoke or re-obfuscate the moment a build leaks. One pipeline, zero stitching.
- Obfuscation + keys + HWID + hosting in one dashboard
- Server-side storage — source is never a public file
- Revoke or re-obfuscate instantly when a build leaks
- Use your own obfuscator? Custom mode still hosts the output
The money question
Luraph is a commercial product with subscription plans — paying for serious obfuscation is reasonable, and plenty of developers do. The hidden cost is what surrounds it: a key system (often $15–$40/mo elsewhere), hosting, and your own glue code between them.
Vampauth's take: the pipeline should be free so your money and attention go to your project. Obfuscation, keys, checkpoints, hosting and analytics are all included free; checkpoint completions pay into your own ad-network accounts, not ours. Optional paid plans only raise limits (up to 50,000 licenses per project) — every feature, including obfuscation, is on the free plan.
- $0 for obfuscation, keys, hosting and analytics
- Your ad links, your 100% — no revenue cut
- Paid plans raise limits only, never gate features
- 10 projects × 10,000 licenses free
Using both — the honest answer
This isn't a page about abandoning Luraph. If you've built confidence in its protection over the years, keep that workflow: obfuscate with Luraph, then upload the output to Vampauth in custom mode and let the platform handle licensing and delivery.
What you get from that combination is the best of both: your trusted obfuscator for protection, and a free, complete platform underneath it for keys, HWID binding, checkpoints, hosting and analytics — the parts an obfuscator was never designed to do.
- Custom mode accepts pre-obfuscated scripts (up to 8 MB)
- Loadstring delivery is in-game-restricted either way
- Key management, resets and bans stay in one place
- No fee for any of it
Source verification: Luraph (lura.ph, by Infinimoon LLC) is a Lua obfuscator operating since 2017; its engine powers obfuscation for other platforms. This page compares categories, not obfuscation strength.
FAQ
Is Vampauth's obfuscation as strong as Luraph's?
We don't ask you to take our word on protection strength — no honest comparison page can. What we can state factually: Vampauth ships a VM-based engine with lite, advanced and maximum presets (maximum is a nested double-VM with tamper-cascading crypto), included free. If you prefer Luraph's engine, obfuscate there and host the output on Vampauth in custom mode — the platform doesn't care where your protection came from.
Why not just use a standalone obfuscator?
Because obfuscation solves only protection. You still need a key system, HWID binding, checkpoint monetization, script hosting and a delivery mechanism. Vampauth provides all of that — with obfuscation included — in one free dashboard.
Does Vampauth replace Luraph?
It can, or it can complement it. Use the built-in engine for an all-in-one free pipeline, or keep Luraph for protection and let Vampauth handle everything else in custom mode. Both workflows are supported.
What does Vampauth cost compared to Luraph?
Vampauth is free: 10 projects, 10,000 licenses per project, obfuscation presets included, no metering. Luraph publishes its subscription plans on lura.ph — we don't restate their pricing here, check their site for current numbers.
Can I use Luraph obfuscation with Vampauth keys?
Yes. Upload the Luraph-obfuscated output in custom mode, attach your checkpoint flow and key settings, and serve it through Vampauth's loadstring URL. Many developers run exactly this combination.
Paying for a key system in 2026?
Vampauth is free for every developer — no subscriptions, no token quotas, no invite codes, no revenue cut. Your checkpoint links pay you directly.
Bring your own obfuscator · keyless (FFA) mode available · 0% revenue cut — your links, your money.
Create your free account